FxPro Raw+ Live Spreads — Measured, Not Advertised — FxPro Thailand
Real spreads we recorded on FxPro’s own MetaTrader 5 Raw+ feed — 6 instruments, 3,150,815 ticks sampled, last captured 2026-08-28. The spread you actually trade on, not a marketing ‘from 0.0’.
Open FxPro Account →The tables on this page are assembled from a large body of readings taken on FxPro's own Raw+ terminal, which is a different kind of evidence from the handful of fills you will collect in your first week here. That distinction matters most to a trader who has just changed brokers, because a switch arrives with suspicion attached and suspicion settles itself quickly on very little data. One wide fill establishes nothing about an account; a pattern that repeats on the same instrument at the same time of day establishes something. On Raw+ the entry cost has two parts, the quoted spread and $3.50 per lot per side, so $7.00 across a round turn, and a fair reading of what a trade costs you has to carry both. Give the account enough ordinary sessions to build a record of its own, then compare it against that record rather than against your memory of the broker you left.
This is the live, hour-by-hour measured spread feed (refreshed daily). For the Standard vs Raw+ cost comparison and fees, see our spreads & costs page.
Measured Raw+ spreads (pips)
| Instrument | Best (min) | Typical (median) | Busy market (p90) | At capture | Ticks sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 354,500 |
| GBP/USD | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 489,121 |
| AUD/USD | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 427,708 |
| USD/CAD | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 432,641 |
| USD/JPY | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 485,627 |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 15 | 15 | 19 | 15 | 961,218 |
Best = the tightest quiet-market quote we saw; Typical = the median you usually trade; Busy market = the wider spread to expect about 10% of the time (news, rollover, thin liquidity). ‘At capture’ is the live spread at the last reading. Metals such as XAU/USD use a different contract size, so their cash cost is on our gold page. Server FxPro-MT5 Demo, feed 2026.08.28 08:55:11.
Spread through the trading day (measured, last 24h)
| Instrument | Tightest (avg) | Widest (avg) | Worst spike | Through the day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.2 (03:00) | 1.33 (00:00) | 7.4 (00:00) | |
| GBP/USD | 0.6 (03:00) | 4.636 (00:00) | 15 (00:00) | |
| AUD/USD | 0.295 (21:00) | 4.447 (00:00) | 25 (23:00) | |
| USD/CAD | 0.291 (09:00) | 5.355 (00:00) | 25 (23:00) | |
| USD/JPY | 0.3 (08:00) | 4.671 (00:00) | 16 (23:00) | |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 15 (08:00) | 143.092 (00:00) | 175 (00:00) |
Table hours are FxPro server time (about UTC+3 / EET); the highlighted guidance above is shown in ICT. Average pip spread by hour over the last 24 hours, with the worst single-tick spike. Spreads run tightest in the peak London–New York overlap and widen around the 00:00 server rollover and the thinner Asian hours — the sparkline is each instrument’s daily shape.
What it costs you per lot (Raw+)
| Instrument | Typical spread | Spread cost / lot | Commission (round turn) | All-in / lot | All-in (pips) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.2 pips | $2.00 | $7.00 | $9.00 | 0.9 pips |
| GBP/USD | 0.6 pips | $6.00 | $7.00 | $13.00 | 1.3 pips |
| AUD/USD | 0.4 pips | $4.00 | $7.00 | $11.00 | 1.1 pips |
| USD/CAD | 0.4 pips | $2.89 | $7.00 | $9.89 | 1.37 pips |
| USD/JPY | 0.3 pips | $1.88 | $7.00 | $8.88 | 1.42 pips |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 15 pips | $15.00 | $7.00 | $22.00 | 22 pips |
All-in round-turn cost for one standard lot (100,000 units): typical spread × pip value, plus the $7 Raw+ commission ($3.50 per lot per side ($7.00 round turn) on Raw+ and cTrader accounts). On a Standard account you pay a wider spread instead of that commission — see the full spreads and costs page.
Open FxPro Account →Advertised ‘from 0.0’ vs what we measured
FxPro markets Raw+ as spreads ‘from 0.0 pips’ — a best-case floor. Across our sample the tightest EUR/USD quote we recorded was 0.2 pips and the typical was 0.2 pips. That is normal: the ‘from’ figure is a floor you rarely trade on, so judge a Raw+ account by its typical spread and how far it widens under load (the p90 column), not the headline number.
How we measured this
- Recorded on FxPro's own MetaTrader 5 Raw+ account — the broker's real pricing feed, not a third-party estimate.
- Captured in-terminal by an MQL5 expert advisor that logs every tick's bid and ask, so the spread is exactly what the platform shows.
- 3,150,815 ticks across 6 instruments; the figures refresh on a schedule.
- Demo and live Raw+ share the same pricing feed, so these spreads are representative of a funded account.
Spreads are variable and widen around high-impact news and the daily rollover. Past readings do not guarantee future spreads. Last updated 2026-08-28.
A few days is a story; a month is a sample
Everyone who changes broker runs an informal test in the first week, and almost nobody designs it. The usual shape is to trade normally, notice the fills that felt bad and form a view. That procedure is guaranteed to produce a complaint, because poor fills are memorable and ordinary ones are not, and a week holds too few of either to tell you which of them was typical.
The tables above exist because that problem is unavoidable at small scale: they are built from a volume of readings no individual account accumulates in a first month. Your own experience is still worth collecting, but it answers a narrower question. Not what this account quotes in general, but what it quotes on your instruments, at your hours, at your size. Asked that narrower question, a first month is enough. Asked the broad one, a first year would not be.
You would be comparing weeks, not brokers
The comparison every switching trader wants to run is against the account they have just left, and it cannot be run. A fair version would need both accounts quoted at the same minute on the same instruments, and the moment the old one closed that experiment became impossible. What is left is this month here against a recollection of some other month there, and markets differ between months by more than accounts differ between brokers.
This is why the honest first-month question is about fitness rather than ranking. Not whether this is tighter than what you had, which is unanswerable, but whether this is steady enough for what you do: whether your instruments behave consistently, whether the widening lands at hours you can avoid or absorb, and whether the entry cost still leaves your usual trade enough room to work. Those questions have answers, and the answers come from this account alone.
The old broker has stopped being a control
For as long as the previous account remains your reference point, every ordinary event here gets read as a comparison, and most of those readings are wrong. A quote that widened in a thin hour becomes evidence about the broker rather than evidence about the hour. A fill a fraction worse than the chart suggested becomes a grievance rather than the ordinary consequence of buying at one side of a quote.
What replaces it is an internal baseline. After a few weeks of ordinary trading this account has a history of its own: the instruments you use, the hours you use them in, the cost you typically accept. Compare against that and the questions become answerable - is this week unusual for this account, is this instrument behaving differently from last month. It is also the only comparison that will still be available to you a year from now.
What a first week can and cannot settle
| The question you are asking | Settled by a first week? | What actually settles it |
|---|---|---|
| Was that one fill unusually wide | No | The same instrument at the same hour, seen repeatedly |
| Do my instruments exist here and behave sensibly | Yes | Opening the list and watching them across a few sessions |
| Is the entry cost survivable for my usual trade | Yes | The per-instrument rows above, plus $7.00 for a Raw+ round turn |
| Is this broker tighter than my last one | No, and neither will a year | Nothing - the old account stopped quoting the day it closed |
| Does the widening land at hours I actually trade | Only partly | A month of your own sessions, at your own times |
The measured readings above describe the feed. This table is about what your own first weeks can honestly add to them.