FxPro Raw+ Account — FxPro Thailand
The FxPro Raw+ account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips plus a commission, built for active traders and scalpers.
Open FxPro Account →Raw+ is FxPro's raw-pricing account: the spread is quoted as it comes and the entry cost appears as its own line, $3.50 per lot per side, or $7.00 across a round turn. The Standard account carries no separate commission and folds the same cost into a wider quote, indicatively around 1.2 pips on EUR/USD. For a trader arriving from another broker the trap at sign-up is the name. Raw, zero, ECN and pro are product names rather than standards, and the tier you held elsewhere may share a word with a tier here while being built differently underneath. Read the shape instead: is the entry cost inside the quote or beside it, and does the separate charge scale with lots. Then pick the shape that fits the trading you already do, rather than the one whose label matches the account you are leaving, and leave that choice alone long enough to produce a month you can actually read.
What Raw+ actually delivers (measured)
What the Raw+ account actually delivered when we measured it on FxPro’s own MT5 feed:
- EUR/USD measured at a 0.2-pip median spread and about $9.00 all-in per standard lot.
- That breaks even in 0.9 pips, and the spread measured perfectly stable (stability ratio 1) — tight and steady enough to scalp.
- Across the majors the measured spread sat at or below an independent interbank reference feed (EUR/USD −0.1, AUD/USD −0.5, USD/CAD −0.7 pips).
- Market orders in our test filled in about 78 to 99 milliseconds with near-zero slippage and no rejects.
- Raw+ commission is tiered by order size, with a minimum on the smallest size:
| Order size | Commission (Raw+) |
|---|---|
| 0.01 lot | $4.00 per side |
| 0.1 lot | $3.50 per side |
| 1.0 lot | $3.50 per side |
First-hand from the live feed — full detail on our measured spreads and execution pages.
FxPro Raw+ at a glance
- Raw spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs
- Commission of $3.50 per lot per side
- Built for frequent traders and scalpers
- Runs on MetaTrader 4 (cTrader offers a similar raw model)
- Contrasts with the Standard all-in-spread account
The names rhyme; the accounts do not
Sign-up screens across this industry all use the same short vocabulary, and not one of those words is defined by anybody. A tier called raw at one broker and raw at another may agree on the idea, a narrow quote with the cost billed separately, and disagree on everything that decides your bill: what the per-side charge is, which instruments it covers, and whether the tier exists on the platform you actually use. The word is the least informative thing on the page.
What does carry across is structure. There are only two shapes an entry cost can take, inside the quote or beside it. Raw+ and cTrader take the second shape at $3.50 per lot per side; the Standard account takes the first and quotes indicatively from 1.2 pips. Work out which shape you were on before, then compare like with like: a quote against a quote, or a quote plus its commission against a quote plus its commission. That comparison is portable in a way the tier names never are.
Do not let the packaging edit the method
Traders arriving from an all-in quote meet a separate commission line for the first time and react to it, usually by trading a little less so they see it less often. The line is not new money. It was always being paid; it simply sat inside the quote and was therefore invisible. Reacting to its new visibility means the account has just edited a method that had nothing wrong with it.
The same mistake runs in the other direction. Arriving from a commission account onto an all-in quote makes the entry cost vanish from the statement, and a cost that cannot be seen quietly stops being counted. Neither reaction is really about pricing; both are about where the number is printed. The check is easy and worth making after the first weeks: has your trade count moved, and if it has, can you point at a reason that is not the position of a line on a screen?
Choose once, then let a month happen
A migrating trader has something a beginner does not: an existing method with a known frequency and a known instrument list. That makes the account question answerable on day one rather than after a season of exploration, which is the good news. The bad news is that it also makes the question easy to keep reopening, because there is always a week in which the other shape would have been the better one.
Churn is the expensive habit here and it costs nothing in fees. Switching tiers part-way through a month means no month was ever traded on a single pricing model, so nothing in the record answers the question that caused the switching in the first place. Pick the shape that matches your frequency, hold it through a month of ordinary trading, then read the total. If the other shape wins on that evidence, move once and move deliberately.
Your previous tier is evidence, even when its name is not
The account you are leaving carries one genuinely useful piece of information, and it is not the label. It is whether the tier was ever chosen. A great many traders are on the shape they were handed at sign-up, never revisited, and in that case the previous arrangement is not evidence of anything - it is a default that happened to persist. A tier that was picked deliberately, for a reason you can still state, is a different matter, and the reason usually still applies here.
There is a second thing the old account can tell you, and it is sharper. Look at whether your trading changed after the pricing did. If the trade count moved when the tier moved, the packaging had been quietly editing the method, and that tendency travels with you - it is a property of the trader rather than of the broker. Knowing that about yourself before you choose here is worth more than any comparison of the two shapes.
Reading a new account tier before you open one
- Name the shape you are leaving: was the entry cost inside the quote, or billed beside it?
- Find the equivalent shape here rather than the equivalent word. Raw+ and cTrader bill beside the quote at $3.50 per lot per side; the Standard account builds the cost in.
- Settle the platform before the tier. Raw+ runs on the MetaTrader side and a raw-pricing model is available on cTrader, so the platform you intend to use narrows the list first.
- Price your own frequency across both shapes, using the instruments on your own list rather than the pair everybody quotes.
- Open one, and give it an ordinary month before you reach a verdict. A tier changed part-way through erases the only evidence that could have settled the question.
Each item is a reading or a decision taken before the first order; none of them changes an account you already hold.
Reading the account you are leaving
| What the old account shows | What it actually means | What to do with it here |
|---|---|---|
| You chose the tier deliberately, for a stated reason | There was a decision, and it probably still holds | Find the same shape here rather than the same word |
| The tier was simply the default at sign-up | It was never a decision, so it is not evidence | Decide it now, from your own frequency and instrument list |
| Your trade count changed when the pricing changed | The packaging was editing the method | Watch for the same effect during your first weeks here |
| You were never sure which tier you were on | The cost sat inside the quote and stayed invisible | Expect a separate line to feel larger than it is |
| You switched tiers more than once | No month was ever traded on one pricing model | Hold one shape through a full month before judging it |
The point of the exercise is to arrive with a reason rather than with a habit. Either shape can be the right one; an unexamined one rarely is.
Frequently asked questions
My previous broker called its account ECN - is Raw+ the same thing?
How do I compare an account with a commission against the one I had without it?
Should I open the tier whose name matches my old account?
I have never seen a separate commission line before - should it change how often I trade?
Can I decide the account tier on day one, or should I trade for a while first?
How long should I stay on one tier before considering a switch?
Does the platform choice come before or after the account tier?
What traders report
Two of these five reviewers raise the same objection nine years apart: the money you need before you begin. A four-star trader points out that US$100 is expected up front while some brokers ask for nothing, and an older review calls the deposit rather big — yet both still rate the account well once they are inside. The praise is all about what happens afterwards: spreads close to zero on an account that still feels ordinary, cTrader's toolset, MT5 running without trouble, and, from the one reviewer who holds overnight, swap charges that stayed modest.
A cool way to experience tight, near to 0, spreads on quite a standard account!
Feeling like cTrader is the future of trading in general , they are just making it super comfortable and offeting powerful tools for trading . The spreads are tight too !
Fxpro expects a min deposit of $100 before you start/ many brokers require no such minimum, but other than that, a raw account coupled with mt5 works without troubles!!
Started six months ago. Deposit is rather big, but if you really want to earn, there is nothing to do on the market with less. Avantage of FXPro is a convenient platform. No commission for withdrawal.
Thank god FxPro doesn’t charge high swap commissions. I've been holding short positions on gbpusd and eurusd since november. Still waiting for the p[arity against the dollar. SHOOOORTT! 🚀🚀
Related FxPro pages
Accounts billed by commission rather than markup interact with deposit currency in ways that are easy to overlook, because conversion happens before anything is traded. It is worth pairing the Thai central bank's rules on currency transfers with a look at how FX prices are formed.